| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Page deletion
editThis page (then an article on a different person) was proposed for deletion in May 2005. It was proposed again in July 2007, and again in November. It was subsequently to the title Lindsay Ashford (activist), which was again proposed in February 2010 and deleted. This article was written in November 2008. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:46, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Untitled
editThis page seems to have been the victim of vandalism, conducted through the misuse of the disambiguation feature. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.215.75.138 (talk) 07:45, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
What the *bleep* happened here?
I came looking for information about one of the most influental and significant figures in the pedophilia-debate of the world, and all of a sudden his page is gone in favour of some obscure paperback writer?
This is vandalism, and this "delete all serious articles on pedophilia related topics" campaign some people seem to have going, is really starting to piss me off. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.215.75.138 (talk) 07:42, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- This will explain things: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsay Ashford (activist). Fences&Windows 22:12, 15 June 2010 (UTC)