Talk:Lead time

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Project management.

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Better overall perspective on lead time?

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Disclaimer: (1) I am the author of the page listed below. (2) My company is selling a supply chain software.

The present quality of the lead time page is low. It literally reads like an advertising for the feature-catalog of some my own competitors.

A more sensical approach to lead times https://www.lokad.com/lead-time that I believe to be worth linking. Naturally, due to the obvious conflict of interest that I have, I will let someone else proceed if deemed relevant. Joannes Vermorel (talk) 09:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Talk

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

If anyone disagrees with the changes I made here at around 16:43, February 13th, please contact me on my user talk. Thanks, Bioarchie1234 15:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

An example would be scheduling the start of a 2 week activity dependent with the finish of the successor activity with a lead of 2 weeks so they will finish at the same time.

What the fuck is this trying to say? How does one start an activity dependent with the finish of the successor activity? 121.45.210.174 (talk) 08:50, 19 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Different meaning for different industries?

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article looks of poor quality to me because the same concept "lead time" has cover related by very distinct problems depending of the industry being considered. Not too sure about what should be done about this very page though. --Joannes Vermorel (talk) 14:19, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic