Talk:LDRA Testbed

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Content Update

edit

I have updated the article to include references. --Nat Hillary 22:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nat hillary (talkcontribs)

Categorization

edit

I can find no clear evidence that the LDRA testbed is either open source or non-commercial. The websites listed talk of demos (as in demoing via the web or via a remote desktop) but it was not obvious that either source or non-commercial binaries were available from the links provided. Can someone add a better link for this, or resection as a commercial package? Jcday (talk) 20:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

The LDRA Testbed is a purely commercial product. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.55.12 (talk) 00:16, 12 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LDRA Testbed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:33, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply