Talk:LB&SCR E2 class

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Isaacirigo in topic LB&SCR E2 more information

Pictures?

edit

pictures? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.36.140.136 (talk) 23:00, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

If you look in the template above, there is a question mark icon indicating that someone has already raised this issue. (That is the 'official' way to ask.)
In practice it may be that pictures of these engines are few and far between, and any decent ones are likely to be copyrighted, as are any pictures of 'Thomas'. There were only ten examples built, and all were scrapped in the early 1960s. -- EdJogg (talk) 13:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

There is an 'official LBSCR' photo from June 1913 reproduced in D.L. Bradley's Locomotives of the LB&SCR Part 3, between pages 124 and 125, which is bound to be out of copyright if anyone has access to the book and a scanner. --Das48 (talk) 14:08, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes and yes; I assume that you mean fig. 108 "E2 No. 100 in works grey, June 1913. Short side tanks and lever reverse", but are you sure it's out of copyright? That book was published September 1974, and the image is uncredited. Official works photos were primarily taken for the company's internal records, not necessarily for publication (although many were indeed sent to magazines such as The Railway Magazine). If this was first publication, it's very much in copyright. Bradley died circa 1985. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
No I am not absolutely sure - but it is highly likely. LBSCR copyrights would have passed to Southern Railway and then British Railways and lapsed after fifty years. I think it likely that the photograph was published soon after it was taken. The fact the the RCTS did not add any ownership statement next to the picture (as they did with most others) is also an indication that they do not regard the copyright as theirs.--Das48 (talk) 08:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Whatever the copyright status, the image would very likely qualify for use under the "fair use" possibility as no examples of this class have survived. The Brill railway station and Richard Beeching pages contain examples of images reproduced under this heading. Lamberhurst (talk) 19:24, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

LB&SCR E2 to make a come back?

edit

A friend shared this with me - http://lbscre2no110society.weebly.com - Should this be worth mentioning? ChipmunkRaccoon (talk) 02:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

@ChipmunkRaccoon: It's a primary source. We should only mention things that have been covered by reliable third party sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
There are lots of railway preservation societies with schemes like this, few have got anywhere - the economy doesn't have nearly enough spare money for luxuries like new-build steam locos. Until something has been reported by others as actually happening, it remains at best WP:CRYSTALballing and care should be taken when mentioning it, to avoid deletion as a WP:HOAX. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

If only some E2s were preserved.

edit

I wish some E2 0-6-0 tank engines were preserved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.222.108.204 (talk) 22:40, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I really want some E2s to be preserved.

edit

I wanted some E2s to be preserved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.1.117.60 (talk) 16:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

I suspect, based on your question, that you found one of our over 5.4 million articles and thought we were affiliated in some way with that subject. Please note that you are at Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and this page is for discussion on how to improve the LB&SCR E2 class article. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:48, 15 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LB&SCR E2 class. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:13, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Non-Free Photographs

edit

There are two images of the E2 class on the commons commons:Category:LB&SCR_E2_class, so why are we claiming fair use for others. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 18:53, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

LB&SCR E2 more information

edit

Hello, I am addressing the creator and contributors of the LB&SCR E2 wiki page. I could give the editorial staff a hand, I could share my information about the E2, it is almost ready with the links given on the page, I have read the information and compared it with photos. If you want, first check my information and then you can tell me if I can help. When you respond, I will send you my writing and some photos that might interest you of the E2s engines. Isaacirigo (talk) 04:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply