 | Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Nonsense
editThis article is wholly nonsense. User:84.9.45.60 18:17, 10 June 2006
- It might benefit from a diagram or two, but I don't know that I'd want to be the one to draw them! Cranston Lamont 06:16, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's not nonsense. Try searching for it on Google. A diagram would be great, or why not a photo? AnemoneProjectors (talk) 13:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- Just to keep the record straight, I'm not the person who wrote the first line about "nonsense"; I was replying to it. Cranston Lamont 15:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oh yeah I know that. I was replying to you both at the same time :) AnemoneProjectors (talk) 15:36, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- Just to clear this up I've signed that guy's statement, so you can tell them apart now :) Tyciol (talk) 09:03, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Oh yeah I know that. I was replying to you both at the same time :) AnemoneProjectors (talk) 15:36, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- Just to keep the record straight, I'm not the person who wrote the first line about "nonsense"; I was replying to it. Cranston Lamont 15:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
"Restrain"
editRestrain from what? Erection? Then write that down! --81.227.72.130 (talk) 22:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- I can't think of an encyclopaedic way to say "flapping around". anemone
│projectors 23:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC) - On the article about Foreskin restoration it claims that the purpose of the Kynodesme was to prevent the glans from being seen since it was deemed to be obscene.--Timtak (talk) 09:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Underwear?
editCould a thing like this be considered underwear, and if not then what type of clothing would it be?★Trekker (talk) 22:40, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Image
editMaybe we should get a better image to this article. The one that is already in the article is very hard to tell.★Trekker (talk) 22:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC)