Talk:Kornati

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Pronunciation

edit

Could we have a pronunciation guide for such entries? The Italian here is helpful, but doesn't indicate the pronunciation in English.Darylchris (talk) 13:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Page name move

edit

Suggest moving Kornati to Kornati Archipelago and Talk:Kornati Islands to Talk:Kornati Archipelago.

  • It's odd that that page and its talk page don't match.
  • "Kornati Archipelago" seems to be in use more formal and generally precise a descriptor than "Kornati Islands".
  • "Kornati" sounds like an adjective, is it?
  • Kornat (island) seems to read as the largest island of the archipeloga.

--SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:34, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think a rename should be in order but I'm not sure about the exact format as this topic has several issues which need addressing. Per this discussion perhaps Kornati (archipelago) could be a better solution to satisfy the ones who claim that "islands" or "archipelago" are not part of the common name. Like I explained in the discussion, Kornati is the short native form of the whole group, and uses the Croatian plural suffix. It could be translated as "(the) Kornats" in English, although most of the time the Kornati form is left unchanged in English. The full native name is Kornatsko otočje, which literally means "(the) Kornat(i) islands". Also, there the issue of Kornat (island), which is the biggest island in the archipelago and which the whole group is named after (at the moment Kornat is a redirect pointing to the archipelago article). The article about the island should probably switch names with the redirect. The third issue is what to do with the Kornati National Park, which covers most of the archipelago (but not all of it) and which is currently a subsection of this article. The park is listed on the UNESCO tentative list of natural heritage sites and is referred to as Kornati National Park on their website, while the island group is described as "the Kornati archipelago". At the moment some interwiki links from this article point to articles about the park and some to articles about the archipelago (interestingly, this article points to the article about the park in the Croatian wikipedia, even though they have another article about the archipelago as well). In view of all this I suggest the following:
Timbouctou 10:59, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
I agree that the discrepancies are pointless, I'll fix those two redirects in a bit - one is leftover of three consecutive page moves and the other is a leftover from the time before the largest island had its own article. Although, I don't at present see any particular need to split the national park info from the islands/archipelago info. The two are practically indistinguishable in the real world, that is, the difference is not really notable. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:22, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
And, to further clarify - nothing else, AFAICT, is also called "Kornati", so there is no need to disambiguate. The basic criteria from Wikipedia:Article titles trump the very subtle distinction between the toponym and the national park. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:30, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kornati. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Something is seriously wrong with the layout of this page