This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Newer English-language publications using "von Jungingen" include Desmond Seward's The Monks of War (1995), Eric Christiansen's The Northern Crusades (1997), William Urban's The Teutonic Knights (2003), and Stephen R. Turnbull's Tannenberg 1410 (2003). Olessi03:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
Significant edits to remove copyvio have been made stripping the article to the basic facts about Konrad von Junginen. Assertions about copyvio have to explain where the copyvio actually resides in the edited text prior to reversion! Benkenobi18 (talk) 06:44, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Benkenobi18: Material came from [1] which was also noted earlier in the page history. By way of comparison see [2]. I see no indication that this page got its material from Wikipedia originally. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 06:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
These are all basic facts, name, date of birth. It doesn't appear that you're aware of the edits. Copyvio can't be sustained against basic facts. Restoring.Benkenobi18 (talk) 06:57, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Benkenobi18: No doubt that this page is a stub and that the facts presented are basic. Never-the-less the entire page consists of a copy and paste from another website, which does not appear to have any license for this content to be here. There are other ways of presenting this basic information than the exact order and sequence presented here. I will be posting at the WP:Copyright problems board to bring more eyes onto this. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 07:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Don't bother. I am currently working on the page because the stub is frankly, an embarrassment. I was very surprised to see that no work had been done on this and that the only work had destubified it to a redirect after removing significant portions of what was there previously. Benkenobi18 (talk) 07:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
I had already done it but removed it when I saw the overhaul you did. Happy editing and Best, Barkeep49
