Talk:Konak, İzmir

Move request

Even for purposes of distinguishing from Konak (residence), the use of adding (District) in parenthesis is debatable. Other localities called Konak are specified by the country where they are located (Serbia and Bulgaria), but Konak, İzmir is probably more appopriate in the case of this Konak, since there are a few other localities called under the same name in Turkey, and this one is the historical and actual center of the metropolitan area of İzmir. I tried to move myself as I did for Urla, İzmir, but it didn't work. Cretanforever (talk) 11:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

• Weak Support Why is this being debated? Is there any controversy in this rename? Certainly Konak (District), İzmir isn't the right name; per WP:NC:CITY, there's no need for two qualifiers. Additionally, parenthesised terms are not usually capitalised per WP:NCDAB. I don't know enough about this place (or Turkey) to know if this is the correct new name, rather than District of Konak, Konak (district) – note capitalisation – or Konak (İzmir), but I note that the Turkish Wikipedia uses the proposed name. --Rogerb67 (talk) 21:59, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

File:Izmir Alsancak 6.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Izmir Alsancak 6.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Requested move 19 March 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 03:52, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

---

Konak, Izmir → Konak, İzmir – undo move contrary to WP Turkey standard MOS practice In ictu oculi (talk) 20:13, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

"Konak, Izmir" has been the article's stable name since 2011, [1]. Technical requests, Requests to revert undiscussed moves, is not the place to reverse titles that have been in place for a long time. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 01:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:24, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

• Support see comment on other RM. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:05, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
• Support see comment on other RM. No such user (talk) 15:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
• Closing comment: Yes, see Talk:Karataş, İzmir#Requested move 19 March 2017 for a fuller discussion and also closing comment. Andrewa (talk) 03:52, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Konak, İzmir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090306034032/http://www.izmimod.org.tr/egemim/uia/egemim%20uia_04-10+eyuce.pdf to http://www.izmimod.org.tr/egemim/uia/egemim%20uia_04-10+eyuce.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 7 December 2017 (UTC)