Talk:Knowsley Hall shootings/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Dumelow (talk · contribs) 18:28, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 20:37, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Starting first read-through. Tim riley talk 20:37, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments after first read-through
edit- Lead
- "(also known as the Murder in a Mansion case)" – this term is not mentioned (or cited) in the main text. See WP:LEAD – there should be nothing in the lead that is not covered in the body of an article.
- Removed, I don't think it's very important- Dumelow (talk) 09:53, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- "Knowsley Hall, Merseyside" – Knowsley is in Merseyside now, but was in Lancashire at the time. There was no such county as Merseyside in those days.
- Good point, added a note to this effect - Dumelow (talk) 09:53, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Background
- "located in Merseyside" – as above
- As above - Dumelow (talk) 09:53, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- "who had down-sized their staffs significantly" – two things here. First, neither the OED nor Chambers hyphenates "downsize"; secondly this is the first of four appearances of "significant/ly" in your text. This advice comes from Plain Words: This is a good and useful word, but it has a special flavour of its own and it should not be thoughtlessly used as a mere variant of important, considerable, appreciable, or quite large ... it ought to be used only where there is a ready answer to the reader's unspoken question "Significant, is it? And what does it signify?" You mean "considerably" or some such here and "considerable" or similar for the later three.
- Changed as you suggested - Dumelow (talk) 10:03, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- "Winstanley had been born in nearby Aintree" – it's ten miles from Knowsley to Aintree. I don't call that "nearby".
- Amended to "around five miles north-west of Knowsley Hall", measured roughy to the Blue Post pub. this 1937-1961 map shows there wasn't much else there besides the racecourse at that time - Dumelow (talk) 10:03, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Shootings
- "Smoke Room ... First Library ... Second Library" – not clear why the capitalisation here and later. A "smoke room" is not a proper noun; nor is a "first library"
- Yes, not sure why I had that. Decapitalised - Dumelow (talk) 10:03, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- "He pled for his life" – in the King's English the past tense of "plead" is "pleaded"
- Changed as you suggest - Dumelow (talk) 10:05, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Police search
- "The Liverpool City Police responded to the call and attended the house" – this is misleading. Knowsley was not in the jurisdiction of the Liverpool City Police. Superintendent W. J. Wooff of the Lancashire County Police took charge of the search. Eighteen patrol cars were ordered by radio to Knowsley Hall, and 100 men were mobilised in the Leigh, Seaforth, Wigan and Widnes Divisions of the Lancashire constabulary and rushed to Knowsley. CID cars from the Liverpool force were sent to help the Lancashire officers.
- Thanks, that's great info. Do you have a source I can cite for that? - Dumelow (talk) 10:09, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Rather a pick-and-mix for my summary of the policing, above. The superintendent's name and initials come from "Knowsley Charge" in The Liverpool Echo, 24 October 1952, p. 12; the Lancashire police divisions are from "Shooting Incident at Peer’s Home", The Scotsman, 10 October 1952, p. 7. Sorry I can't give you URLs for these, as I access them online with a password that's no use to anyone else, but if you have access to the British Newspaper Archive they're both in there. I can email you facsimiles of the cuttings if wanted. Tim riley talk 10:48, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Tim, I've added the info you've posted here for now. The removal of the BNA from WP:TWL has been a big loss for working on these sort of articles. If access ever gets sorted I would love to expand this (and many others) further! - Dumelow (talk) 13:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Rather a pick-and-mix for my summary of the policing, above. The superintendent's name and initials come from "Knowsley Charge" in The Liverpool Echo, 24 October 1952, p. 12; the Lancashire police divisions are from "Shooting Incident at Peer’s Home", The Scotsman, 10 October 1952, p. 7. Sorry I can't give you URLs for these, as I access them online with a password that's no use to anyone else, but if you have access to the British Newspaper Archive they're both in there. I can email you facsimiles of the cuttings if wanted. Tim riley talk 10:48, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Trial
- "focussed instead on Winstanley's previous good character" – why "focussed" rather than the customary "focused"?
- Changed as you suggest - Dumelow (talk) 10:05, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Legacy
- "Lord Derby ordered that the doors to the smoke room be locked indefinately" – spelling
- Fixed - Dumelow (talk) 10:05, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- "a dramatic remodelling of Knowsley Hall by architect Claud Phillimore" – clunky false title
- Removed "dramatic" - Dumelow (talk) 10:05, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
My first thought was that there is so much to object to about the article as it stands that I should fail it for GA, but looking over my comments, above, I think the text could be brought up to scratch with some work on the nominator's part, and am therefore putting the review on hold. – Tim riley talk 09:30, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi User:Tim riley thankyou for a speedy and thorough review. I have made edits as above, if you could get back to me on a source for the police response that'd be a great amendment to the article - Dumelow (talk) 10:09, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Overall summary
editGA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Well referenced
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Well referenced
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Well illustrated
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Well illustrated
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I found this an interesting and instructive article to review. I spent my teens living in Knowsley (of which, let me tell you and anyone else, the first syllable should rhyme with "cow" rather than "show") in the 1960s and have been surprised to read about the 1952 events at the Hall. It gives me much pleasure to affirm GA-status for this article. – Tim riley talk 13:48, 30 December 2024 (UTC)