Talk:Keenan Cahill

Birthday?

What's up with his birthday on his page? I don't even understand what is written there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.93.170.75 (talk) 02:19, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

It's the time when he was born. Why an editor thought that was needed, I have no idea. Is it really a fact that needs to be on there? ThePwnStick 19:18, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Notability question

Why should this wiki-page exist really, you could go make a page for every single person with 10 youtube videos trying to sing-along.. it takes the point out of the whole WikiPedia thing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.56.119.94 (talk) 18:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Because he has had significant coverage in news media, he deserves an article. Notice however, that there is not much discussing anything other than that which is reported in the news, Sadads (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Not every lipsyncer gets such notables as 50 Cent to collaborate. Not every lipsyncer is dealing with a condition as rare and debilitating as Maroteaux-Lamy Syndrome. Also, internet fame is not by definition less notable than fame on other forms of media. And even if it was, as has been said, he has acheived print and television notability as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.220.90.2 (talk) 14:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

First Live Gig

He performed 'Dynamite' at the SF Giants AT&T park last night. It was branded as his first live gig. I'm sure there's a MLB press release about it somewhere - there is a video here http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=15714517 but i don't know how long it will last. Someone should add all this. FloreatAntiquaDomus 15:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by FloreatAntiquaDomus (talk • contribs) ... pie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.14.123.88 (talk) 06:02, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Man?

The first line says that he's a man from Elmhurst. 16 year old kids are men now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.197.235.88 (talk) 16:51, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Reverting edits by 68.116.56.146

Page was recently vandalised, have reverted to state prior to edits 94.192.95.155 (talk) 17:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

There is no need to report vandalism here. Just revert it unless the page is protected. If there is persistent vandalism, report it at WP:AIV. Cresix (talk) 17:48, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keenan Cahill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120501153415/http://www.oakridgeboys.com/home/265-youtube-sensation-keenan-cahill-and-the-oak-ridge-boys-debut-whatcha-gonna-do to http://www.oakridgeboys.com/home/265-youtube-sensation-keenan-cahill-and-the-oak-ridge-boys-debut-whatcha-gonna-do

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

missing citations on notable claims

unsourced assertions will be removed. please correctly cite before readding. thanks! Saintstephen000 (talk)