Talk:Karađorđeva šnicla/GA1

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Rollinginhisgrave in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 23:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Rollinginhisgrave (talk · contribs) 08:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this over the next day ~ Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 08:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 10:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Prose and content

edit
  • on the side either the tartar and lemon should also be specified as being served on the side, or nothing should.
    •   Done
  • it has since become as you use since in the next sentence, and it's not necessary here
    •   Done
  • decorated it garnishing (avoid double it in sentence, clumsy)
    •   Done
  • he named he had renamed
    •   Done
  • dismissed it as a monarchistic creation could you clarify what "it" is here?
    •   Done
  • for the consumption of for using
    •   Done
  • Can you explain what kaymak is somewhere?
    •   Done
  • Steak can be made from the steak
    •   Done
  • representing the Order of Karađorđe Star haha I'm sure that symbolism was what he was going for when he had run out of butter and chicken
  • refuted I would say disputed. Maybe this is OR, but I wouldn't say the people who were claiming it was a copy meant it literally in the sense that it had the same exact ingredients as a filling. Feel free to disagree.
    •   Done
  • Cheese, prosciutto, and kaymak are then added to the mixture thereafter as a filling or blended in?
    •   Done

Suggestions

edit
  • Lastly, he poured He finished by pouring
    •   Done
  • where his family prepares MOS:DATED
    •   Done

Sources

edit
  • [3]  Y
  • [5] This source is saying it was first made in 1959. It also says to fry "until golden brown on all sides." I wouldn't really say it's a RS for the "classic" recipe, given it makes no indication, and I am unconvinced of its scholarship re; food history. The nova.rs source should be sufficient I imagine.
    • Stojanović himself has said that it was first made in 1956 or 1957, I do not remember seeing him anywhere say that it was made in 1959, so I don't know where Blic got that from.
  • [6] This source is saying it is fried for 8-10 minutes.
    •   Done
  • [6a]  Y
  • [6c]  clock He has advocated for the consumption of non-veal meats in Karađorđeva šnicla, citing religious or cultural restrictions. I don't see this in the source, can you quote the relevant text?
    • "Međutim, i druge vrste mesa dolaze u obzir i poželjno je prilagoditi recept ukoliko neko „zbog običaja, tradicije ili veroispovesti" ne može da konzumira originalni sastojak."
    • "„Ako, na primer, Indijac ne jede teletinu, damo mu ćuretinu ili musliman ne jede svinjetinu, napravimo od teletine - meso može da se menja, ali kajmak mora uvek da bude prisutan", naglašava Mića Stojanović."
  • [6e]  Y I understand that there are a lot of side dishes that can be listed, but I have heard about boiled green beans on two different sources, I understand this would be worth mentioning. ~
    •   Done
  • [6g]  Y
  • [9]  Y
  • [12]  Y
  • [14] I am unsure what this source is adding.
    •   Done Removed.
  • [15a]  Y
  • [15c]  Y
  • [15e]  Y
  • [18]  clock Unconvinced of whether this is notable as an actual established item worth noting. From the reaction it elicited, it isn't clear whether it is established in any way as a religious fast variant.
    •   Done Removed.
  • [21]  clock should be noted that it was speculated to just be a bad translation.
    •   Done

Other

edit
  • Neutral  Y
  • No COPYVIO / OR  Y 15.3% Earwig
  • Stable  Y
  • Broad / summary style  Y
  • Images appropriately tagged  Y

Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 14:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. I've addressed your comments. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 11:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Perfect, thanks for these changes. Passing now. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 13:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.