Talk:Kambampati Nachiketa

Fair use rationale for Image:Nachiketa12.jpg

Image:Nachiketa12.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 13:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

about some recent content removal

i have reverted the edits [1] and have also given proper reliable sources for the same. such editors should learn to place "Cn" tags rather than going around with "blatant and deliberate content removal " regards--ÐℬigXЯaɣ 05:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Any unsourced contentious claims are to be removed. It is one thing when things are not controversial, and you should assume good faith. Attacking other editors will not help your case. And do not use attack headings when bringing it on talk page, it is counter productive to the purpose of bringing this here. Asking others to provide references for your claims is Tendentious editing. --lTopGunl (talk) 16:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

• Made my response pointwise so that it will be easier for you to understand.

1. you seem to forget what "Cn" tags are for, would advise you to read it again..SLOWLY this time.. till then if you have understood the use of "Cn" tags then also keep it in mind to use them on stuff that you dont like. ,
2. yes, I can see personal attacks made by you on almost every admins page where u go on blabbering against me.
3. It was never MYclaim as you say. Please check BEFORE you make stupid claims such as these. I did not placed them you were the one who removed it without even feeling the need to check its reliability, with false reasons. and i backed them up with proper sources.
4. I never asked you to put sources for content in article, go up read again my comments on top this time slowly i simple asked you to place "Cn" tags so that other editors who are willing to look for them will provide it.--ÐℬigXЯaɣ 17:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Take this issue anywhere you want. Any unsourced content that is objectionable is bound to be removed. It was completely on my discretion whether to place cn tag or to remove it (even then another editor might decide to remove it). I have not made any attacks on you anywhere, I did however asked an admin to investigate some suspicious activity by 3 users and a few IPs including you which is unrelated to this case while you personal attack of calling me disruptive is. Yes it becomes your claim when you want to restore it. Any content you add or add back is then your with responsibility to provide enough sources to keep. I donot need to read cn documentation since I've read WP:RS which is what is followed here. Your current comments are uncivil and if you continue with this I'll have to report you for it. --lTopGunl (talk) 10:48, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kambampati Nachiketa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.kashmir-information.com/Heroes/nachiketa2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:33, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kambampati Nachiketa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080221172415/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com:80/articleshow/1896706.cms to http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1896706.cms

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)