Talk:Joyful, Joyful/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Hahc21 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 15:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Review

edit
Lead
  • Good. It could be rewritten to be a little more clear but that's just a recommendation.
  • Fixed some minor mistakes there.
Background
  • Great
Composition
  • Great, although i think it could be made a little bit longer.
Critical reception and performance
  • Great, although i think those could be better as subsections of "Reception".
Credits
  • Good.
Charts
  • Good.
References.
  • Good.

The article is great. It passes the criteria. Cheers! —Hahc21 20:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.