Talk:Johnson cult

Melanesia Low‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Melanesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Melanesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MelanesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MelanesiaTemplate:WikiProject MelanesiaMelanesia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Papua New Guinea Low‑importance

	New Guinea portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Papua New Guinea, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Papua New Guinea on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Papua New GuineaWikipedia:WikiProject Papua New GuineaTemplate:WikiProject Papua New GuineaPapua New Guinea
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[Untitled]

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Bartholomew-Billings article indicates that the ridicule of the Johnson Cult was spread in part because the Aussie govt. didn't want to deal with the "Johnsonites'" political grievances. Could be a worthy contribution to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KJJ (talk • contribs) 22:50, 18 April 2005 (UTC)Reply

Original research

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article contains a lot of what seems like original research, and it has no cites. I removed some of the most egregious offenses (like the paragraph interpreting the events through Marxist historiography), but it needs more work.--Cúchullain t / c 07:59, 16 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've clarified the nature of the "cult" based on the Bartholomew & Billings article, inserted a quote, added relevent categories, and removed the "cargo cult" category, since this clearly is not a cargo cult. Aridd (talk) 10:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Johnson cult. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050413101001/http://www.forteantimes.com/articles/192_johnson1.shtml to http://www.forteantimes.com/articles/192_johnson1.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic