Talk:John Raymond Broadbent (quartermaster-general)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Raymond Broadbent (quartermaster-general) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Untitled
editIs there a source given for the date of death? There was also a John Raymond Broadbent junior and it may have been him who recently died. Diverman 01:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
http://www.ww2roll.gov.au/script/veteran_certificate.asp?VeteranID=152979
The 1893 birth only made it to Temporary Brigadier (substantive Colonel) and not Major General: http://www.awm.gov.au/honours/honours/person.asp?p=NX34728
Date of Death verified http://www.rootsweb.com/~nswsdps/ausdb461.htm
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 17:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Brigadier classed as General
editBased on the Brigadier article, they are classed as a General. The www.generals.dk site also class him as a general. — Diverman 11:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- No, brigadiers are not generals. What the article says is actually "it is not always considered a general officer rank, it is always considered equivalent to the Brigadier General or Brigade General of other countries." Australia follows the British model in which brigadiers are certainly not general officers. Because he is equivalent to a general does not mean he is a general. -- Necrothesp 12:18, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Naming consistency - Requested Move
editThere has been a move request for John Raymond Broadbent (1914-2006) → John Raymond Broadbent (Major General)
As there seems to be general support for this move, it would seem logical to move John Raymond Broadbent (1893-1972) → John Raymond Broadbent (Brigadier)
The discussion is at Talk:John Raymond Broadbent (1914-2006) --Pdfpdf (talk) 04:13, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Action
editIf there are no objections in the next 48 hours, someone will move:
- John Raymond Broadbent (1914-2006) → John Raymond Broadbent (Major General)
- John Raymond Broadbent (1893-1972) → John Raymond Broadbent (Brigadier)
--Pdfpdf (talk) 11:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose They were both brigadiers at some point in their careers. Use either dates or professions, i.e. "Infantry officer", "Quartermaster". DrKiernan (talk) 15:06, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I don't follow your logic about both Brigadiers; only one of them was a Major General. However, I can see merit in using profession. Pdfpdf (talk) 15:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Well, how about "Major General" and "Quartermaster"? DrKiernan (talk) 15:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Done
editAs per Talk:John Raymond Broadbent (Major General), I have moved:
- John Raymond Broadbent (1914-2006) → John Raymond Broadbent (Major General)
- John Raymond Broadbent (1893-1972) → John Raymond Broadbent (Quartermaster)
And more tediously, I have fixed the double redirects. --Pdfpdf (talk) 14:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)