Talk:John Edward Robinson

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 17:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:John Edward Robinson.jpg

Image:John Edward Robinson.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:John Edward Robinson.jpg

Image:John Edward Robinson.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Gor lifestyle?

I saw no reason to have a reference to a book series in this article. Robinson followed a BDSM --which is the most well known term for it-- lifestyle, and calling it anthing else is likely to confuse readers. Unless someone can point out how the series directly influenced Robinson to take up his lifestyle I'm removing the reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.149.10 (talk) 09:53, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

I do not believe Robinson was an active participant in BDSM. According to the biography "anyone you want me to be" he simply used BDSM as a method of finding victims. To people outside of the BDSM community, this may be a minor point, but to those of us who are in the BDSM community it is a very important distinction. Throckmorton Guildersleeve (talk) 20:03, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Citation

Yeah, it's needed but I don't have my sources handy just now. Will have to wait a few months unless others want to step in?214.13.149.10 (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

gor lifestyle

Yes, you have to keep it in. 1 of the women murdered was very familiar with the gor lifestyle. Gor lifestyle is more all encompassing. A person gives up their IDENTITY to the master including bank accounts and SSN. It would have alarmed a "normal" person to sign a slave agreement, but someone familiar with Gor would find it appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elizabeth98011 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Where is the reference for this? This is the first time I have heard of this in regards to this case. The fact that some of Robinson's behavior might be considered as falling inline with the Gor lifestyle is not reason enough to include it in the article unless it can be shown that he acknowledged and practiced it himself.68.249.103.53 (talk) 19:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

"International Council of Masters"

My research indicates that there was never any group, even a secret one, by this name. Given Robinson's propensity for lying and exaggeration, it's more likely he concocted this group at some point, either to mislead investigators and researchers, or in a bizarre attempt at self-aggrandisement.Desmond Ravenstone (talk) 02:43, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

I have no doubt that you're correct, since Robinson has seldom purposefully said anything truthful in his life -- but unfortunately, you can't add it to the article without citing the references you used in your research. The reference currently cited does not say it was a fictitious organization. If you have reliable sources saying it was yet another of Robinson's fabrications, feel free to make the change again, and cite the sources. Cheers, DoctorJoeE (talk) 16:16, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Doesn't seem right to keep it in as a stated fact with nothing else to back it up. I think that part would be better stated as "He claimed to be part of" than a flat out "He was part of."70.236.76.41 (talk) 23:48, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

I find this source about as reliable as the source offered for the support of the International Council of Masters. [1] The offered source for the existence of this group is the only one that I've been able to find, and, by itself, does not offer a single clue as to where that information might have come from. All research into the provided sources do not come up with a single mention of this organization. It appears to be a student project and one wonders how reliable that source can be.108.213.241.108 (talk) 20:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Can't say that I disagree. So is there consensus for removing that sentence entirely? DoctorJoeE ^{talk to me!} 22:11, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:41, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

---

John Edward Robinson (serial killer) → John Edward Robinson – Primary topic. Page views: 74, 4,097. Marcus Qwertyus 00:15, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

• Support per nom.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Email hoax

The section with the above title is unsourced, and I have been unable to find any evidence that it is true. Even if it is, it does not contribute significantly to the article and demonstrates no relevance to it. So I'm going to remove it in a few days, unless someone objects strenuously and can put forward a cogent argument in support of that objection. DoctorJoeE ^{talk to me!} 13:44, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on John Edward Robinson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004231910/http://voices.yahoo.com/woman-wins-lawsuit-halt-profit-sought-man-who-366573.html?cat=9 to http://voices.yahoo.com/woman-wins-lawsuit-halt-profit-sought-man-who-366573.html?cat=9
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111009170220/http://www.livedash.com/transcript/cold_case_files-%28sex%2C_lies_and_murder%29/612/KICU/Tuesday_February_23_2010/204568/ to http://www.livedash.com/transcript/cold_case_files-%28sex%2C_lies_and_murder%29/612/KICU/Tuesday_February_23_2010/204568/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070121194127/http://www.courttv.com/trials/robinson/ to http://www.courttv.com/trials/robinson/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Edward Robinson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713161906/http://www.kmbc.com/r/9236762/detail.html to http://www.kmbc.com/r/9236762/detail.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Did he die By lethal injection or Electric Chair

Can’t find on how he died, does anyone know? ThatGuyCade (talk) 23:17, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Still alive. Larry Hockett (Talk) 05:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)