Talk:Joachim Helbig/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk) 01:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC) In the next 24 hours, I'll read the article and post some comments below. Initially, it looks very interesting, and I'll enjoy working with you on this project. Auntieruth55 (talk) 01:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   what does StG 1 refer to?

   make sure the references to time are consistent, okay?

   Also, some of your translations are in parens after the text, and some of before For example, the Cross with Oakleaves is in English, with German in parens, but almost everything else is in German with English in parens. I suspect if you're taking this to ACR, such consistencies will matter. I'm not going to hold up GA on this, because I know you'll conscientiously take care of these things.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: