This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jefferson Memorial article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 13, 2013, April 13, 2020, April 13, 2023, and April 13, 2024. |
Ionic or Ionian
editWell, which is it? I don't like the word ionic. It sounds like chemistry. But do these words mean the same thing?Longinus876 (talk) 15:38, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Locate and include inscription
editIf you’re injecting fear into other people, then you’re trying to kill their minds. You’re trying to get them to stop thinking. That’s antithetical to the founding of this country. It’s on the Jefferson Memorial. I’m stealing this from Jefferson, but I’m also stealing it from the movie Born Yesterday. Bill Holden takes Judy Holliday to the Jefferson Memorial, and they read the inscription together. ‘I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.’ Fear is an attempt to impose tyranny over someone’s mind. It’s an act of oppression.[1]
File:Jefferson Memorial At Dusk 1.jpg to appear as POTD soon
editHello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Jefferson Memorial At Dusk 1.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 15, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-02-15. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Cato Institute
editI think the criticism section is POV, considering that it consists primarily of one oppositional voice, heavily quoted, from a partisan think tank, which is apparently trying to take back ownership of jefferson from the New Deal era, and return it to the neoconservative movement. I think there may be some disagreement about this being "objective" and unchallenged. I think that pretty much any memorial, no matter how revered, can have a criticism found of it, so i dont have a problem with a secxtion. Statue of Liberty has a brief mention of opposition to the memorial, but doesnt have a section criticizing the entire premise of the memorial. The section would be better if it contained evidence that more than one voice has criticized the monuments ties to liberalism, esp in its use of quotes. my previous comment here was removed appropriately for its tone. im better now. If i can find some comments, either positive or negative, to add here, i will.(mercurywoodrose)50.193.19.66 (talk) 17:40, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Map
editThe map at the head of the article should show the exact location of the Memorial.Paulhummerman (talk) 13:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- It does, it's that red dot. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)