Talk:Japanese battleship Tosa

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Japanese battleship Tosa article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Japanese battleship Tosa is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Japanese battleship Tosa is part of the Tosa class battleships series, a featured topic. It is also part of the Battleships of Japan series, a featured topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 23, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
May 5, 2010	Good topic candidate	Promoted
May 11, 2010	Featured article candidate	Promoted
December 11, 2019	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 24, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the sinking of the Japanese super-dreadnought *Tosa* (pictured) influenced the design of the Yamato* classs?*
Current status: Featured article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Japanese / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

Japan High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 13:09, December 20, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Whitespace

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I took a screenshot of the most recent revision to show what I mean about whitespace showing on larger (i.e. wider) montors. On 1024-ish monitors though, it's fine, so I don't know if anything should be done - or if it should , what could be done... - The Bushranger (talk) 19:17, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've shifted the image left, which should prevent the artificial whitespace from ocurring. -- saberwyn 22:07, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

date of test

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

According to the report S-01-9 of the US Naval Technical Mission to Japan (Underwater Protection), the test with the 300 kg charge near frame 192 (Test three) was carried out on june 9th (see table on page 193 of the report), not on june 8 th as stated in the article. wbr, Alexpl (talk) 09:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic