Talk:Jamshed Bharucha
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Jamshed Bharucha be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Connecticut may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Cooper Union
editI recently cleaned this section up a little bit to be more accurate, although it is still undersourced, incomplete, and not up to date. I will keep working on this and would appreciate help from anyone. Most of this material also needs to merit inclusion in Bharucha's article somehow, rather than only belonging in the Cooper Union article. Thoughts? Eflatmajor7th (talk) 20:13, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia policy call for all articles to be written in a neutral point of view. I have removed new material which I believe violates this policy, and I call on the editor to explain why they think their edits are neutral. BMK (talk) 19:48, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Jamshed Bharucha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150611134010/http://cscufcscu.com/ to http://cscufcscu.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101224091404/http://ucpressjournals.com/journal.asp?j=mp&jDetail=editorial to http://ucpressjournals.com/journal.asp?j=mp&jDetail=editorial
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110117144251/http://provost.tufts.edu/1172048132183/Provost-Page-prov2w_1174562916192.html to http://provost.tufts.edu/1172048132183/Provost-Page-prov2w_1174562916192.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110213093815/http://provost.tufts.edu/1174149599326/Provost-Page-prov2w_1296830224349.html to http://provost.tufts.edu/1174149599326/Provost-Page-prov2w_1296830224349.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:48, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Again...neutral point of view
editAs BMK correctly points out above, Wikipedia policy call for all articles to be written in a neutral point of view and pages are not supposed to serve as resumes in order to serve self-promotion (WP:PROMOTION). To me, this particular article has always read like a promotional website for Mr. Bharucha. Does anyone else have that impression or is it just me? If it's me, I'll defer. User:Qflib (talk) 05 October 2017 (UTC)
The rapidity with which this page is being updated to reflect changes in Dr. Bharucha's employment status leads me to guess that he is either editing his own page or it is being done at his direction. It is important to note that for obvious reasons, wikipedia strongly discourages this. (See WP:AUTO). KeeYou Flib (talk) 18:13, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Edits have been made to remove the extraordinary amount of unsourced and self-promotional material from the article which were completely unsuitable for a wikipedia encyclopedic entry. There are still some citations needed for what remains. KeeYou Flib (talk) 12:42, 4 May 2021 (UTC)