Talk:James Mark Baldwin

Untitled

I think we should move the section on Baldwinian Evolution to the Baldwin Effect stub. Reagle 14:42, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)

The section on Baldwinian Effect needs carefull attention and may have to be rewritten. (Lunarian 10:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC))

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Just a note on the links to the Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology

In case anybody is wondering, the reason for separate links to the Google Book Search volumes is that, the last time I looked, the general search doesn't tell you which volume is which. On the other hand, the Internet Archive search does tell you, so there was no reason for distinct links to each volume. Also, thanks to user Danny Lost for his additions to the links and for his coping so nicely with the table. The Tetrast (talk) 02:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC) Separate links to individual volumes were also needed for MSN Live Book Search, but that service was discontinued, so I deleted that row from the table. The Tetrast (talk) 01:06, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Gene/Genome? Anachronism?

Did Baldwin really talked about "genes"? That would imply rather a rather premature nomenclature in the late 19th/early 20th century: the Genome article says that the term was introduced in the 1920s. This raises some doubts about the article's correctness? -- 89.247.112.176 (talk) 11:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Baldwin and Maine de Biran

I sugggest that the whole section on "Baldwin and Maine de Biran" be deleted. Only one part of it, the quote from Baldwin, is relevant to the subject of this article, and it is a tiny part of Baldwin's total work. This section has the appearance of something implanted by a fan of Maine de Biran. Dark Formal (talk) 03:00, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

OK, enough time has gone by for objections to be voiced. I went ahead and deleted that section. Dark Formal (talk) 03:20, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James Mark Baldwin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060909123018/http://spartan.ac.brocku.ca/~lward/Baldwin/documents.html to http://spartan.ac.brocku.ca/~lward/Baldwin/documents.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060827122809/http://spartan.ac.brocku.ca/~lward/Baldwin/Baldwin_1906/Baldwin_1906_toc.html to http://spartan.ac.brocku.ca/~lward/Baldwin/Baldwin_1906/Baldwin_1906_toc.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 6 December 2017 (UTC)