Talk:James C. Marshall

James C. Marshall has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 1, 2015. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the James C. Marshall article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Missouri Mid‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state) Mid‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / North America / United States / World War I / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

A fact from James C. Marshall appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 February 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that James C. Marshall was the first Chief Engineer of the Manhattan District?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James C. Marshall.

Wikipedia

substitute MEDALS?

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In the Manhattan District article the original code name is given as "Development of Substitute Materials". I can not check the reference, but I think "Medals" is probably wrong. --AJim (talk) 04:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Done Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:01, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:James C. Marshall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 11:39, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this one. Could take a week or so, RW pressing right now. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 11:39, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	In the lead, suggest linking Manhattan Project to the first mention of the Project, rather than the district. suggest toured the battlefields duplicate links of WWII and BG in the lead suggest promotion accelerated suggest placing for Laboratory Development of Substitute Materials in parentheses suggest and Marshall would be given an overseas posting
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Single image, licensing ok.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Fine.
	7. Overall assessment.	~~Placing on hold for a week for a few prose issues to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 11:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)~~ Passing. Good job. Regards, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 01:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

All recommended changes made. Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:59, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic