Talk:Isotopes of nickel

Latest comment: 1 month ago by 2A04:CEC0:193F:D8BF:CD21:99EE:C2FE:7C9B in topic Beta plus decay of 59Ni?

Isotope percentages

edit

It is the noted high percentage (68+percent) constituency of the lowest number (Z=58) stable isotope of 28Ni that results in the atomic weight of 28Ni (58.6934) to be less than the previous element 27Co (58.9331). This is because all of the stable isotopes of 27Co have 59 nucleons, whereas 68 percent of the 28Ni isotopes are stable with only 58 nucleons.WFPM (talk) 17:34, 16 August 2010 (UTC) This illustrates a peculiarity of the atoms of the even Z elements in that they are able to remain stable over an increased and wider range of accummulated extra neutrons (above the Z number) than can the atoms of the odd Z numbered elements. EE28Ni58 is also noted to be unusual due to the exceptional low number of "extra neutrons" (greater than Z number) in its nucleus (there are only 2) as compared with its adjacent elements, whereas the stable isotopes in its neighboring elements are noted to be OE27Co59, with 5 extra neutrons and OE29Cu63 with likewise 5 extra neutrons. This illustrates the lesser need of the 28Ni58 for extra neutrons as a stabilizing factor.WFPM (talk) 18:51, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

It is also noted that element 28Ni Nickel is 2 elements lower than 30Zn Zinc in the transition metal series. And therefor the 2 extra neutrons of EE28Ni58 may have been the interference factor in the accumulation process that kept the atom from acquiring the additional 2 deuterons needed to become EE30Zn60 via the deuteron accumulation process.WFPM (talk) 18:09, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

That the trend in favor of increasingly heavy atomic size elements was still in existence at this point is witnessed by the fact that in addition to the stable isotope OE29Cu63 (69%), 31% of the 29Cu atoms were also stable at OE29Cu65 with 7 extra neutrons.WFPM (talk) 03:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Explanation needed for units used in half-life

edit
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of nickel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Beta plus decay of 59Ni?

edit

The two links [1]http://www.lnhb.fr/nuclides/Ni-59_com.pdf and [2]http://www.lnhb.fr/nuclides/Ni-59_tables.pdf provide a 3.7×10-5 % rather than 1.5×10-5 % probability of beta plus decay for 59Ni. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 08:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

And also here...= 2A04:CEC0:193F:D8BF:CD21:99EE:C2FE:7C9B (talk) 03:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply