Talk:Island bronze-naped pigeon/GA1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by SilverTiger12 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SilverTiger12 (talk · contribs) 00:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


Comments:

  • An explanation of what "moderately quick decline" means would be nice.
    • Just what it sounds like, a decline that is moderately quick. The IUCN assessment doesn't have any estimates or anything, so nothing else I can do but quite them.
  • Is there anywhere you can link "shade forest" to?
    • Can't find a suitable target article.
  • ...hunting pressure on the pigeon may be increasing as a substantial number of young children are involved in hunting. Why does young children being involved mean that the pressure is increasing?
    • Just realized that the IUCN assessment doesn't make this claim, reworded to "may be increasing and a substantial number of young children".
  • Range map, please?
    • Added.
  • Why is no average weight range given?
    • No measurements.
  • Are male and females sexually dimorphic in terms of size, or just coloring?
    • Just coloring.

Birb :) [are tasty] Happy editing, SilverTiger12 (talk) 00:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

SilverTiger12, see responses above. AryKun (talk) 13:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I'm passing this article now. Happy editing, SilverTiger12 (talk) 13:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.