Talk:Isca Dumnoniorum

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Devon Mid‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

If I were building new town walls...

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'd build the new ones, _then_ demolish the old ones. Is there a reference that it is as (perhaps casually) written? Wight it be simpler to phrase it "replaced with new ones enclosing a larger area" if we don't know in which order it was done? Midgley (talk) 04:53, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

That whole para (the last under 'Civilian Town') needs referencing. I'll see what I can find. —SMALL JIM 10:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Isca Dumnoniorum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://exeter.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=2887
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120708032030/http://www.roman-britain.org/tribes/dumnonii.htm to http://www.roman-britain.org/tribes/dumnonii.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120512150808/http://www.roman-britain.org/places/isca_dumnoniorum.htm to http://www.roman-britain.org/places/isca_dumnoniorum.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic