A fact from Isabelle Connor appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 August 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gymnastics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gymnastics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GymnasticsWikipedia:WikiProject GymnasticsTemplate:WikiProject GymnasticsGymnastics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Copyvio check is fine, article is long enough and new enough. Looks like this is your third DYK nomination, so no QPQ required. The hook fact is included in the article and is contained in two sources. However, as per MOS:INTRO the hook fact appears in the lead, but it should also appear somewhere else in the article. Let me know when you've addressed this minor issue, thanks. DrThneed (talk) 08:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Copyvio check is fine, article is long enough and new enough. Looks like this is your third DYK nomination, so no QPQ required. The hook fact is included in the article and is contained in two sources. However, as per MOS:INTRO the hook fact appears in the lead, but it should also appear somewhere else in the article. Let me know when you've addressed this minor issue, thanks. DrThneed (talk) 08:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Riley1012, thanks. All good now, both hooks approved so promoter can take their choice, but personally I prefer the detail of ALT1. DrThneed (talk) 00:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)