Talk:Interstate 595 (Maryland)

Relationship to MLK

Does anyone know if the current MLK Blvd -- which connects the old I-170 to the B-W Parkway (295) and I-95 (via I-395) -- follows the path originally intended for I-595 in Baltimore? --Jfruh 01:00, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Umm no, from what i can digg up, MLK and I-395 were purpose built to their current configuration, minus alterations due to Camden Yards, and were not part of any other highway configuration. From what i can gahter, I-595, would have used I-170 and then went sounth useing the aligment proposed for I-70 between I-170 and I-95, connecting to I-95 near Caton Ave, their are ghost ramps on 95 marking where the I-70/I-595 connection would have been located.

• http://www.kurumi.com/roads/3di/i595.html#595md
• http://www.roadstothefuture.com/Balt_City_Interstates.html
• http://www.kurumi.com/roads/3di/balto.html

--Boothy443 | trácht ar 07:35, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

That last map is particularly illuminating ... I think I'll make links to it on some of these pages... --Jfruh 13:47, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 595 (Maryland). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for //nwindianahwys.homestead.com/i97_1982.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:37, 31 March 2016 (UTC)