Talk:Interplanetary dust cloud
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
No proper introduction
editThe current version of this article appears to be written for an audience already familiar with the subject. It fails to identify exactly what the "interplanetary dust cloud" is, but launches immediately into its study and aspects. Could someone familiar with the subject attempt to write a proper introduction? Thank you. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 19:27, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- I made an attempt. -- Beland (talk) 17:13, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Map
editIt is requested that an astronomy diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
A map of the known features would be helpful to visualize the thing. -- Beland (talk) 17:14, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- Just as a heads up, this might not be as easy as it may appear, or even really possible. All of these types of dust are pretty much everywhere, in varying densities. Even if you look at the dust cloud from a single comet, this becomes an incredibly complex structure over a few hundred years, with lifetimes much longer than that. Considering that there are hundreds of comets with such structures developed over thousands of years (with fading intensity and structural definition), what you end up is every type of dust being everywhere, just in varying, very complex density structures. These are not fully understood, even though there are databases which estimate the population, mainly by orbit characteristics (a,e,i mainly). Example for a project working on a higher resolution model: The Interplanetary Meteoroid Environment for eXploration - (IMEX) project. We are talking about terabytes of particle data in three space and one time dimension. I at least have no good idea how to visualize this data, and other dust sources are similar. What might be possible is a plot of the dust density from different sources over their semimajor axis. This paper offers something like that, and could be used as a source. — Julian H.✈ (talk) 08:05, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Interplanetary dust cloud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070826132615/http://www.gps.caltech.edu:80/genesis/DocumentN.html to http://www.gps.caltech.edu/genesis/DocumentN.html#BeMe
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Interplanetary dust cloud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050510232920/http://astrobiology.arc.nasa.gov/workshops/zodiac/backman/backman.txt to http://astrobiology.arc.nasa.gov/workshops/zodiac/backman/backman.txt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Effect on astronomical observations
editI've heard scientists complain about the negative effect that this cloud has on astronomical observation beyond our solar system, but I find no mention of this in the article. Can a section for it be added? Schnitzi (talk) 08:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)