Talk:Intermediate distribution frame

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jim.henderson in topic including, but not limited to

including, but not limited to

edit

"Including, but not limited to" is lawyer-speak and is unnecessary since "including" implies additional items already. --Unimath (talk) 16:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I get the impression the source document 1037C is, at least in part, a glossary for lawyers haggling over the meaning of US government contracts. So, yes, much of it should be trimmed down to leaner, sprightlier prose for our purposes. Jim.henderson (talk) 03:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply