Talk:Injustice
This article was nominated for deletion on 7 February 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was Keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2019 and 20 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jmonteiro15.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Requesting Further Development
editIt's quite amusing how the reference to Plato's "What Justice is Not" points straight to the article of "Justice". Whoever did that needs to be writing more articles.
I would really like to see some development here though, we could use a lot more references and perhaps even some examples of injustice.
JulianParge (talk) 21:06, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
suggestion for development of this stub
editIf this article is developed, I would suggest focusing on how injustice is defined at different times and places (the nod to Plato is an example), and not simply trying to catalogue instances of injustice, which would be an endless project subject to endless debates about what is and is not just. Cynwolfe (talk) 19:30, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Injustice
editPaywalled, circular referencing strains credibility and is pompous (not in a good way)
editThe link that is currently #4 under notes and references, is to an article in Wired about how great wikipedia is:
https://www.wired.com/story/want-to-know-how-to-build-a-better-democracy-ask-wikipedia/
So wikipedia is saying if you want to know more about injustice, go give WIred some money. And we can presume that the article will tell us how wikipedia is so great for justice and democracy, and how it's free, and that everybody should read it. Wikipedia has strict standards for what qualifies a valid citation. This just looks stupid. Fairthomas (talk) 02:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, Wikipedia is sometimes quite problematic, but despite this so-called "Dark Side" in quotes, of Wikipedia, at least it's still useful. 177.105.94.73 (talk) 22:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)