This alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed.
Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary.
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
As there is no record on this discussion page of anything having to do with the NPOV tag on the main list page, I'm taking the liberty of removing the tag. It is difficult to see any way in which this article list could be POV, but if I am in the wrong, someone please let me know. Thanks. Somnambulent (talk) 00:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
The article is POV in what it includes or doesn't include. There's a subtle POV, for example, in designating "birth control sabotage" to be an issue relating to "men's rights". It's a very difficult issue to fix in a list format; ideally, it should be discussed on the individaul article pages, and where the article identifies it (through sources) as being a related issue, the article should then receive an appropriate category tag. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:29, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. This seems to be an area that would be more appropriately covered by a category, seeing as the list does not aim (and should not aim) to present commentary and elaboration on the topics. A category would be less prone to vandalism and POV pushing and would allow for articles to self-identify as associated with this topic rather than being centrally assigned to. Barring compelling comments to the contrary I intend to establish the category and then nominate this list for deletion. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:27, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
