Talk:Indeed
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Indeed article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 April 2008. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
Vote
edit- note: this section has comments out of chronological order, in breaking with WP:TPG. Also, the section below has addt'l info on COI issues of nominator. - Anon98.92..98.92.189.245 (talk) 16:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Keep or Delete this pointless article
"Delete" Content is self-promotional. External link are not relevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.101.40.60 (talk) 05:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
"stub"? "improve this article"? "reliable references"? If this is OK I'm going to put up my ad! Ben (talk) 19:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete Pointless, uneeded, seems like an ad--Nytemunkey 19:03, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep Relevant start-up with many users. --Stantonschool32 22:07, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Keep Yes keep, it seems to have turned into quite the article these days.--Nytemunkey 02:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete you can type in things like "god" and "satan" and it will give you results. this "wiki article" seems more like a free advertisement for the site at any time
Comment Once again I have to question how we work as editors. If this is noteworthy enough to be included I can think of several companies and business people we have deleted who ought to be on here or have improved bios. PRasmussen (talk) 10:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC) Hi this is CatLance - 2021 hm so I putted the word indeed and some other things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.48.140.52 (talk) 12:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion by a competitor, CVDB.pk. I just closed it as a "speedy keep" since this was a bad faith nomination. Two of this competitor's IPs had been blocked[1][2], its spam article deleted (twice) and its domain blacklisted and this appears to have been a retaliatory act of spite against both Indeed.com and Wikipedia. See:
- MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist#CVDB.pk spam (permanent link)
I reviewed Indeed.com's notability when I closed the debate. This included running a Google News archive search (187 hits) and a look at the company's media coverage page. I believe this company is likely notable however my closure of this AfD as a "speedy keep" was based on procedural grounds.
This article still reads like a company press release, however. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. It's shameless advertising. How do you candidate something fro deletion? I would like to do it for this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emilianovaldes (talk • contribs) 02:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- indeed was invented by Connor not lauren —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.48.217 (talk) 13:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
do they charge for their services
editmost job seekers want to be able to filter out the companies that charge you for their services
IS INDEED FREE FOR JOB SEEKERS?
- Yes, it is free for job seekers 97.105.47.162 (talk) 18:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indeed.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120223135856/http://www.resfly.com/2012/02/new-feature-indeed-apply/ to http://www.resfly.com/2012/02/new-feature-indeed-apply/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)