Talk:I-Opener

Latest comment: 4 months ago by 66.11.103.80 in topic References

Untitled

edit

The reason I removed GNU Linux is because i was trying to Put more emphasis on Windows

Beyond Hacking

edit

Most of this article talks about how the i-Opener can be hacked to operate as a "real" computer; this comment applies even to the sections outside of the Hacking section. But the article really should talk about how the manufacturer intended the i-Opener to be used. In addition to a description of the device itself, this would include a discussion of the subscription dial-up Internet service. Some screen shots would also be nice.

Incredible as it may sound, as of this writing, some people continue to use the i-Opener for their Internet access without having hacked the device; they continue to subscribe to the dial-up service provided by the manufacturer. The final nail is not yet in the coffin! Mark D Hardy 17:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Price

edit

The original price was not $99; if I remember correctly it began selling for $300-$400, the price was cut to $200 (Here's a reference to some advertising which sets the price at $199), and it was only near the end of its life that the price was slashed to $99. 65.102.175.141 (talk) 18:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Someone put a sticky saying the article doesnt site references. It doesnt need to. I found this info out from google searches and different web sites. i did my own research —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.151.133 (talk) 05:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

yea the article used to have a bunch of good info and pictures, looks like NinjaRobotPirate really set the article back in some past edit.. Wish I was a better Wikipedia editor to put some of that back in. 66.11.103.80 (talk) 00:09, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

...which is precisely why you do need to cite your sources. This is not "common knowledge." You did research. You need to do more than tell us it came from The Googles. The entire purpose of citation is to show us exactly where you got your information from, so that we can see it ourselves and know you did not pull it out of a black hole.

This article needs some details. What were the complete specificiations of the original machine? And the "Pizza key?"161.165.196.84 (talk) 21:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Pizza

edit

No article about the I-Opener is complete without mention of the "pizza button." My memories are blurry, as it was ten years ago, but someone should insert a little blurb. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bgates3 (talkcontribs) 18:47, 14 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on I-Opener. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Rewrite

edit

The rewrite is sourced, but the old version isn't. Per WP:BURDEN, the unsourced stuff can't be re-added until it gets properly sourced. For one thing, that bit about "James Kmetz" looks like a hoax. No reliable source mentions this person. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

In this edit, 98.227.211.197, an IP editor from Indiana, added a hoax. Other IP editors from Indiana, including 98.227.213.180, have been edit warring to maintain this hoax in the article. I've semi-protected the article to stop this. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:31, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Stuff about the hacking

edit

search:

"Ken Segler" "hard drive" "I-opener"|"Netpliance"
.... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 05:46, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply