Talk:Hypomania Checklist

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kennyle78.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Possible assessment template option

Hello, I have created a potential assessment template that might be helpful in creating such pages. They are by no means perfect, but I would highly suggest using them to keep things streamlined. Please see the page here. Thanks for working on this page - it's a great start! Ongmianli (talk) 19:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

@Ongmianli: If you haven't already, you should solicit feedback on your template from the experts at Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine and Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 20:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

@Animalparty: Thanks for the prompt feedback! I am working on this currently, and I will get back to the experts at Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine and Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology about the page in about a week or so. I have read the WikiProjects' guidelines carefully, and I agree with it. Just need time to work on this. Much appreciated! Ongmianli (talk) 20:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

comment

Hey, this is Rachael! Let do new comments at the very top and reply comments as directly underneath with a indent! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkang101 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

“My mood is higher, more optimistic”, “I think faster”, “I need less sleep” or “I get into more quarrels” in ‘a period when you were in a “high” state’. The instrument also includes questions regarding the duration, the impact of family, social and work life, or people’s reactions such as “positive and negative”, “positive”, “no impact” or “negative”. Examples of questions for the development and history section from the An (2011) Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Korean Version of Hypomania Checklist-32 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jegenz (talk • contribs) 18:07, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Adding a section with ways the checklist is being improved

Hi! I think it might be valid to add a section that provides readers with information of how they have been working to make the Hypomania Checklist "better" and more valid.

Forty et al. (2010) conducted a study to see if the checklist could be cut in half and still deliver similar results. Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) was reduced to Hypomania Checklist (HCL-16) by picking and choosing the best possible questions to ask patients for the diagnosis. The structure was similar to HCL-32 because it included "active-elated" factors and "risk-taking/irritable" factors.The sensitivity and specificity of the "new" checklist was similar to that of HCL-32. In HCL-16 a score of 8 or higher was an excellent indicator of diagnosisin BD or MDD. The drawback of HCL-16 was it was taken after patients had tested with the HCL-32. Therefore, if this new checklist were to replace the old, it would be important to test the validity. Forty et al. (2010) may have come up with the checklist of the future!

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hypomania Checklist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150923150200/http://effectivechildtherapy.org/content/bipolar-disorder to http://effectivechildtherapy.org/content/bipolar-disorder

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:43, 9 November 2017 (UTC)