Talk:Hurts (duo)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by ModernDayTrilobite in topic Requested move 21 September 2023

The Discography section

edit

is wrong and needs to be fixed as the First single from the album is "Wonderful Life" and has hit #1 in several countries. The second single is "Blood Tears and Gold' which is missing from the Discography. The Third single is "Better Than Love". It is not the first single and it appears that someone may be allowing their taste to direct the discography.MoovieStarz (talk) 22:48, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Album release

edit

נח כיחיבנגעהיכיהעכיהכעיטרה35415610.01ט35ח1יגכ351.2הנע1כגעיי1חד The album Happiness was already released today (August 27th, 2010) in Germany, so the release date is obviously wrong. LaHaine (talk) 18:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Single Discography is incorrect

edit

The order of release of singles on the discography page is incorrect. "Wonderful Life" was the first single released worldwide. Their second single "Blood Tears And Gold" is missing. Considering the UK was one of the last places their music was released in, it should not then determine the order of releases or what has or hasn't been released. Some of the songs like "Stay" have gone #1 in more countries than what is shown. This page needs serious work done to it. (MoovieStarz (talk) 14:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC))Reply

first gig ever

edit

their first gig was in Berlin at the fashion event from berlin designer Michalsky in Jan 2010 --Viola.s.tobin (talk) 01:51, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hurts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:25, 4 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hurts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 21 September 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus that there's WP:NOPRIMARY here. (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 18:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


– No primary topic between the group and a bearer of the surname. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 01:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

I don't believe this a correct reading of WP:PTM - people are habitually referred solely by their last name so there is legitimate ambiguity here. --Joy (talk) 09:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
As much as it is easy to accuse any group of people to be incapable of doing something, the use of surnames to refer to people is not restricted to any group of people, it's common in the real world and a fact that the encyclopedia can and should describe. --Joy (talk) 09:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.