Talk:Huckleberry Ridge Tuff is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Ok first off Huckleberry Ridge isn't even the largest eruption in the last 2.5 million years never mind the last 30 Million years. First is Toba at 2800 Cubic Km which was 74,000 years ago. Then there was La Garita 26 Million years ago which was around twice the size of Huckleberry Ridge at 5000 Cubic km. So don't put this in without looking through all supervolcano related articles first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.234.221.216 (talk) 21:53, 18 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
I think it depends on whose estimates for volume you use. Lar Grarita has been revised downwards in recent years. But you should provide a reference for your claims. Also, I am sure if you go far back enough in geological time, the eruptions will get larger and larger. It may not be very usful to compare erruptions of the last few million year to those of 30 million years ago. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Metrodyne (talk • contribs) 00:26, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
