This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Material from Horace Silver was split to Horace Silver discography on December 5, 2014. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I made some edits then got scared I was messing up a nice article so I thought I would bring this here. Silver wrote two books The Art of Small Jazz Combo Playing and Let's Get to the Nitty Gritty: The Autobiography of Horace Silver. At the moment these are listed separately under Further Reading and the Bibliography of the References section. In my mind it would make sense to list these together in a Bibliograpy. Do other editors agree that this makes sense? It would probably mean renaming the bibliography in the references section. Vladimir.copic (talk) 02:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
They're in separate sections because one of them is used as a source for the article and one isn't. It therefore doesn't make sense to have them in one section; thanks for reverting and asking here. EddieHugh (talk) 22:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
