Talk:Hawaiian sovereignty movement/Temp

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Quash-asia in topic Untitled


Untitled

edit

The Hawaiian sovereignty movement generally refers to the collective efforts of organizations and individuals seeking to regain the sovereignty of the Hawaiian people that was lost when the Kingdom of Hawaii was overthrown in 1893. Sovereignty, in this context, generally refers to the power of Native Hawaiians to exercise their inherent rights typically expressed through independent self-government.[1]

Were only Native Hawaiians holding citizenship pre-1893? Quash-asia (talk) 09:28, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Do you think that maybe we should go from here into the history of the movement (i.e."the history of the Hawaiian sovereignty movement goes back to the 1890's, when groups such as Hui Aloha 'Aina[2] struggled against annexation; however, it gained considerable momentum during the "Hawaiian Rennaissance" of the 1970's...etc.)...?

Yes, great idea! I feel stupid for not thinking of it myself!

In United States Public Law No 103-150, a joint resolution passed in 1993, the United States Congress apologized to Native Hawaiians for the 1893 overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the annexing of Hawaii in 1898. In the resolution, the President and Congress of the U.S. admitted that U.S. support for the 1893 overthrow was "illegal" and a violation of "international law". Jon M. Van Dyke of the William S. Richardson School of Law describes the reconciliation process suggested in the text of this law as ongoing, and says that it will necessitate the restoration of the sovereignty of Native Hawaiians and the return of land and resources.[3]

Native sovereignty is a focus of discussion and debate in Hawai'i. Sovereignty organizations often recognize and include non-natives who are either descendants of immigrant subjects of the pre-1893 Hawaiian Kingdom or who have naturalized through an internal process.[4][5][6]

History

edit

Pre-Contact Sovereignty

edit

I'm not sure what to call this -- any ideas for a better heading? Basically, I'd just like to start from the very beginning...

See User:Fang 23/Prehistoric Hawaii. You can start by just calling it "prehistoric". After you've written a paragraph or more, you'll get various ideas, such as "chiefdom". What I try to do is let the content name itself. Viriditas (talk) 01:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Kingdom of Hawaii

edit

Overthrow

edit

Annexation

edit

Statehood

edit

Reconciliation and reparations

edit

ALOHA Association

edit

Native Hawaiians Study Commission

edit

Office of Native Hawaiian Relations

edit

Act 354

edit

Apology Resolution

edit

Akaka Bill

edit

Office of Hawaiian Affairs

edit

Initiatives

edit

Movements

edit
  • Na 'Ohana o Hawai'i
  • Hou Hawaiians
  • State Council of Hawaiian homesteaders
  • Ka Pakaukau
  • Pro-Hawaiian Sovereignty Working Group
  • Native Hawaiian Rights Conference

Draft Blueprint for Native Hawaiian Entitlements

edit

Ka Lahui Hawaii

edit

Ka Lahui Hawai'i was organized in 1987 and claims a membership of 20,000. The group believes that the nation within a nation model is the best way for "indigenous Hawaiians to negotiate with the US and enforce their rights".

Institute for the Advancement of Hawaiian Affairs

edit

Hawaiian sovereignty advisory council

edit

Hawaiian sovereignty elections commission

edit

Features

edit
  • Land base: control and ownership of resources
  • Right to determine citizenship
  • Right to self-government

Models

edit

Independent nation

edit

Return to pre-1893 independence. Hawaii would no longer be part of the U.S. and its people would be citizens of the nation of Hawaii, not U.S. Re-establishment of monarchy, like Tonga for example, is a possibility under this model. Other alternatives include part monarchy and representative government like Great Britain, or a U.S.-style representative democracy. Advantages: right to create treaties, determine citizenship, control immigration, issue passports, stamps, currency, army, management of land and resources, tax collection, courts, schools, police. Disadvantages: seceding from the U.S. would be difficult; economic and military insecurity due to isolated geographical location.[1]

Poka Laenui (Hayden Burgess) is a proponent of this model.

Free association

edit

Nation within a nation

edit

Ka Lahui Hawaii supports this model.

State within a state

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ a b Menton & Tamura 1999, pp. 377-383.
  2. ^ http://www.pacificworlds.com/nuuanu/memories/petition.cfm
  3. ^ Van Dyke 2006, pp.215-239.
  4. ^ Hawaiian Kingdom - Registry of Naturalized Subjects (circ. 1840-1893), Hawaiiankingdom.org, retrieved 2008-10-07
  5. ^ What is a Hawaiian Subject?, Alohaquest.com, retrieved 2008-10-07
  6. ^ Daily Telegraph: Defiant Hawaiian unfurls the flag of freedom, Hawaii-nation.org, retrieved 2008-10-07

References

edit

Primary sources

edit

Secondary sources

edit

Further reading

edit