| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hapag-Lloyd Flight 3378 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How much kerosene?
edit- that there was only 1.3 t of kerosene left in the tanks
How much? Tempshill 22:01, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
- t is the symbol for a teaspoon, which is about 5 mL. So they had 6.5 mL of kerosene. 24.170.177.163 06:13, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
- lol, t is actually the symbol for tonne Dan100 (Talk) 21:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Ton or tonne? Nippoo 23:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Er, tonne, like I said. Dan100 (Talk) 15:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ton or tonne? Nippoo 23:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- lol, t is actually the symbol for tonne Dan100 (Talk) 21:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Assessment Comments
editreferences. map of the route would be good. lead section, plus other sections. And is there a reason this is important? For example, did the incident lead to legislation or regulation involving fueling or inspection of aircraft? So what? --Auntieruth55 (talk) 01:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Google-Translate of official report in German language
editIs it still relevant? Layzeeboi: German diskussion: English-WP version of incident history now more complete than this one Zopp (talk) 19:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Please clarify: Is what still relevant? The article itself? In which case, is your comment relevant? Are you suggesting a nomination for deletion? Layzeeboi (talk) 07:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Time
editArticle suddenly switches from CEDT times to UTC "within the story"... ;-} --Arilou (talk) 13:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)