This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hans Delbrück article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"In fiction"
edit The subsection "In fiction" was subordinated to the top-level section "Hypotheses". I suppose one of the several mentioned occurrences of his name in fiction has given someone occasion for a "hypothesis" about what Brooks intended, but the subordination does violence to the obvious assumption readers are invited to make, that each subsection is about hypotheses that Delbrück put forward (about history).
Without changing the order, i am de-subordinating "In fiction" (i.e. making it its own top-level section) so its context is no longer implicitly "[Hypotheses] in fiction", but rather "[Hans Delbrück] In fiction".
--Jerzy•t 03:21, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
"Beaker"
edit I'm changing "beaker" to "glass laboratory vessel", especially since Beaker_(glassware)#Shape (and its article as a whole) emphasize pouring and mixing (to the exclusion of secure lids, and since i recall an appearance like what Google image search and i call an apothecary jar, and a sense of the prop-vessel being closed. I didn't specify an apoth jar since more specific research is called for, e.g. careful viewing of film scene, by chem/anat-lab glassware pro or in close conjunction with lab-glassware catalog-viewing or tour.
--Jerzy•t 07:18, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Versailles
editWouldn't it be better to link to the article on the Versailles Peace Conference when the Versailles Peace Conference is mentioned rather than the palace? --23.119.204.117 (talk) 03:53, 22 October 2017 (UTC)