Talk:Hanish Islands conflict

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Mikrobølgeovn in topic Israel in the infobox

Page move

edit

I think this page should be moved to Hanish Islands Crisis because it was only one crisis and and the Hanish Islands are a proper noun and should be capitalized... --Merhawie 01:10, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

WP:MILHIST Assessment

edit

Article could use some expansion, and a picture if possible. I do commend you on your NPOV though, it being such a recent event. Thanks for an interesting, well-written article, and for expanding the encyclopedia's coverage of somewhat more obscure topics. (As a pre-modern East Asian historian, I'm with you on this sort of thing!) LordAmeth 00:18, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

No map?

edit

I simply cannot believe that there is not a map in this article, not on the Hanish Islands article. How are we supposed to understand this without maps? Unschool 21:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Agreed.
Further, there is a dead link to (presumably) a chart or map "Eritrea/Yemen: Chart"
in Permanent Court of Arbitration Eritrea/Yemen: Chart http://www.pca-cpa.org/chart4c0a9.gif?fil_id=463 . Tennisjazz (talk) 02:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hanish Islands conflict

edit

I am moving the page to "Hanish Islands conflict" as there are no reliable source returned by a Google search on ["Hanish Islands crisis" -wikipedia] (without wikipidia in the search the return says 196 pages returned, but going to page 3 of those returned shows only 18 pages returned) and there are a few for ["Hanish Islands conflict"]. Unschool's comment about islands or Islands is debatable because the sources use both (as they do for the word conflict). However two reliable sources returned for "Hanish Islands conflict" capitalised that way -- a book and a UN paper ( Lyda Favali, Roy Pateman Blood, Land, and Sex p. 151; and United Nations Capital Development Fund. There is a further book on the conflict (Taylor & Francis Group Africa South of the Sahara 2004, p. 392) that uses the capitalisation Hanish islands so the usage is not clear cut. Further searches for "Hanish Islands" in Google Scholar and Google Books return more hits of "Hanish Islands" that "Hanish islands". --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 09:56, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hanish Islands conflict. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Israel in the infobox

edit

@Abo Yemen: The inclusion of non-belligerents ("Supported by") in infoboxes was deprecated by the community a long time ago (see Template_talk:Infobox_military_conflict#RfC_on_"supported_by"_being_used_with_the_belligerent_parameter). Even if the claim by the Yemeni government was correct (which is unlikely), Israel would still not belong in the infobox. Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 17:42, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply