 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
- These messages are duplicated at Talk:Hana (given name):
Shouldn't this be redirected and merged into the disambiguation page for Hannah (Hanna redirects there)? 70.53.1.20 21:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- User:70.53.1.20|70.53.1.20, its totally different. Could someone add means #1 in Korean? I don't know how to word it right, but I will cite it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.126.112.14 (talk) 03:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, it should not be here. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. And for a disambiguation page, there is too much stuff. See WP:MOSDAB. It needs to be cleaned up a bit. (John User:Jwy talk) 05:41, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
The messages in the preceding box were contributed on Talk:Hana before the content of that talk page and of its accompanying Dab page were divided (with some sharing) for the creation of Talk:Hana (given name) and its accompanying article page. Users responding to those messages should respond below this message, and consider also responding on the other of the two talk pages.
--Jerzy•t 06:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Unhelpful
editHow is this change not helpful? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:16, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- It takes away the helpful information (far from obvious, to the average reader) that people with this name are listed at Hana (given name). I've repositioned the item now (with full information) so hopefully there will be no further diagreements.--Kotniski (talk) 18:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- OK it seems there are, but please state your case instead of just reverting and citing an essay that seems irrelevant to the matter in hand.--Kotniski (talk) 18:44, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'll say it shorter than originally planned: the name link should be the very first item listed and that description "2006, Japanese" for the film entry is redundant. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:50, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- OK, I don't mind that, what I mind is your removing the information that readers looking for information on people/characters called Hana should click Hana (given name). We know that because we know how these pages are arranged, but the average reader won't know that.--Kotniski (talk) 18:58, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'll say it shorter than originally planned: the name link should be the very first item listed and that description "2006, Japanese" for the film entry is redundant. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:50, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- OK it seems there are, but please state your case instead of just reverting and citing an essay that seems irrelevant to the matter in hand.--Kotniski (talk) 18:44, 7 September 2008 (UTC)