Talk:Hadit

Untitled

Ningishidda: Mitochondrial DNA is only contained in the egg so the reference to Hadit being represented by "sperm" is sexist and misleading as well as unscientific. Corrected.

Original research

This site on Horus/Heru [1] is used as a reference to support the claim that 'Hadit' from the Book of the Law is the same as the ancient Egyptian god Horus. The site itself contains no references to 'Hadit'. There is a reference to the Greek name Haidith, but to say that this is equivalent to Hadit based on the similarity alone appears to be original research. No evidence is presented that 'Hadit' from the Book of the Law has an authentic connection with ancient Egyptian religion. Furthermore, there is a reference earlier in the article to DNA. Since DNA was not discovered until decades after the Book of the Law was written, this seems more like an original interpretation or a religious claim rather than encyclopaedic information.--Smcg8374 (talk) 01:45, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hadit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070929025515/http://www.wagenburg.at/staticE/page161.html to http://www.wagenburg.at/staticE/page161.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hadit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071114122952/http://fet.egnu.org/wiki/Main_Page to http://fet.egnu.org/wiki/Main_Page
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071117102407/http://fet.egnu.org/wiki/Hadit to http://fet.egnu.org/wiki/Hadit

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Overemphasis on Kenneth Grant's interpretations

The article's bibliography seems to excessively draw from Kenneth Grant's works and interpretations, citing five books by Grant and only two other sources: an archived and no longer online article and one Thelemapedia article. The article itself has many unsourced attributions which seem to have originated with Kenneth Grant. The archived article, found at https://web.archive.org/web/20071117102407/http://fet.egnu.org/wiki/Hadit, also seems to use Kenneth Grant's works as though they are authoritative. Xelkman (talk) 23:03, 14 October 2018 (UTC)