| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HAPSMobile article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confusion
editIs this article about a company or an aircraft? The lede seems to indicate it is about a company, but then the article body is all about an aircraft type. It is very confusing. If it is about an aircraft then it needs a new lede and renaming, if it is about a company then it needs splitting into two articles. - Ahunt (talk) 14:18, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Both, like Zunum Aero. The company would have a small article, and it may have multiple aircraft projects (hawk50). I would split it later, when it will be sufficiently consistent to not split it as a stub. Meanwhile, the present article may be renamed HAPSMobile Hawk30 if you prefer. I created it that way just by creating the red link.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 14:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- I think it would be best then as an article about the aircraft type at HAPSMobile Hawk30, with some background on the company included, rather than an article about the company that is 90% about the aircraft. Zunum Aero needs some serious fixing too, it seems. - Ahunt (talk) 15:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)