This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Village's people
editInformation about the folk from the village is widely known. Please stop removing the data, thank you. 188.31.187.52 (talk) 18:31, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- What do you mean widely known? It's unsourced and therefore eligible to be removed. Sro23 (talk) 18:34, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
:::Ya, Sro. P.S. As has already been explained to you, that is not a "blocked user's edit." That edit was made by someone else before I was even blocked. But, good for you constantly getting involved in and creating drama! You're such a superstar!207.102.57.130 (talk) 18:36, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Whatever your point, please keep it WP:CIVIL. Creektiming (talk) 18:38, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- I'd be inclined to tag it myself (uninvolved editor). Creektiming (talk) 18:35, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- I've added a source, a reliable one, now everybody shut up. 188.31.187.52 (talk) 18:52, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Revolvy is hardly reliable. It says right on the page that information is pulled from Wikipedia ([1]). clpo13(talk) 18:53, 28 July 2016 (UTC)