This article is within the scope of WikiProject Morocco, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Morocco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoroccoWikipedia:WikiProject MoroccoTemplate:WikiProject MoroccoMorocco articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The article is rife with opinion and woefully lacking in facts. It reads as if it were written by the Spanish foreign service! If nothing changes, there will be a POV event. Adambrower (talk) 00:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
There already has been plenty of POV events lol, I don't understand the link to Spain though, only Ceuta and Melilla are part of "Greater Morocco". MakhzenHuman (talk) 13:57, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I have added a neutrality tag until further notice. The historical context should be fleshed out further, especially going back to medieval Empires (Almohads, Almoravids, Merinids), centered in Marrakech or Fes, whose territorial extent are used as supportive argument by Moroccan nationalists as to the claims of Morocco over wider geographical areas, including Andalusia. The way the historical context is written is as if Moroccan nationalists suddenly decided to claim all of those territories in 1963 with absolutely no justification. And that's just one of the problems of the article. --Ideophagous (talk) 07:19, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
