Talk:Great Rebellion of 1817–1818

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 112.134.79.183 in topic Massacre

Untitled

edit

ok i think u shud hav an argument abt it

I agree.

Good job


What has this minor rebellion have to do with Vietnam?JohnC (talk) 08:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Massacre

edit

Is there any evidence for the unlikely claim that "The British also massacred the male population of Uva above the age of 18 years"Royalcourtier (talk) 04:14, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes. there are plenty of evidence not just for that but also raped commited by British invaders. "unlikely" is a very wrong word, it's like denying the holocaust. http://www.divaina.com/2009/07/22/feature02.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.134.79.183 (talk) 14:07, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Great Rebellion of 1817–18. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply