Talk:Gettysburg (The Office)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by TBrandley in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 17:34, 3 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Issues and suggestions
# Where? Issue Per
1 Infobox Where are guest stars referenced? WP:SOURCE, WP:WIAGA
2 Infobox Add The Office US season 8 link to episode lists, something
3 Lede Link comedy to television comedy instead WP:OVERLINK
4 Lede Same goes for television series, as issue 3 WP:OVERLINK
5 Lede NBC should be the National Broadcasting Company (NBC) for its first mention MOS:ACRO
6 Lede In the episode, to "In this episode"
7 Lede Nielsen Media Research should be Nielsen ratings
8 Production "The A.V. Club reviewer Myles McNutt applauded the writers' use of Andy's "overeager qualities" to have the office group skip the official tour, allowing "some random California heritage site" to stand in for the real Gettysburg" that seems to be about episode themes, not production
9 Production "The Official website for The Office" The Office should be in italics please WP:MOS
10 Production % should be percent please Copy-edits
11 Reception What channel did it air on? Not mentioned here at all. WP:LEDE, etc.
12 Reception ABC should be American Broadcasting Company (ABC) in its first mention here MOS:ACRO
13 Reception Use regular quotation marks, rather than curly, as seen in "didn’t" in reception WP:MOS
14 Reception "mostly" to "generally"
15 Reception "cold opening" remove cold WP:NPOV
16 References Don't shout at me lol Sourcing
17 References Use single quotes in reference titles, rather than double WP:MOS
18 References WP:DASH problems WP:DASH
19 External links Categories should be sorted in alphabetical order please Guidelines
Sorry for the wait. I suddenly went on a Wikibreak. Oh well, that's all. Cheers, TBrandley 01:35, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

No worries about the break! I got all of the issues fixed. The only one I didn't was #1: the guest stars are referenced to the episode, and since this is an article about the episode, it seems rather redundant to cite the episode for the article about the episode. Thanks for the review.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:47, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Looks good now; passing. Well done! TBrandley 01:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply