This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I can see no evidence of personal notability in this article. The author and most prominent editor has twice removed tags placed on the article. It seems abundantly clear that this editor has a clear conflict of interest and is crediting the subject (himself?) with achievements that are clearly that of a team. Claims that the latest addition proves notability wholly misrepresents Wikipedia notability, The ref is an interview in which the subject is quoted - not a reference about the subject himself. At present this is a risk of AfD unless some real evidence of notability is provided. VelellaVelella Talk 01:10, 14 February 2017 (UTC).Reply
All news references (CNN, Washington Post, US Today, LA Times, Popular Science, etc.) refer to interviews and quotes, compatible with the Wikipedia guidelines, and are not references of the subject himself as claimed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planetsrcool (talk • contribs) 02:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC) . I would appreciate if Velella could check / read these actual references in the article, and perhaps consult for another opinion. The notability and content of this page is extremely comparable to astronomers with similar awards. Please proceed with immediate removal if these checks have been performed and notability has not been established. Thank you for maintaining Wikipedia up to high standards. Planetsrcool (talk) 03:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply