Talk:George Tutill
George Tutill is currently an Economics and business good article nominee. Nominated by Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ at 18:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page. Short description: Banner manufacturer (1817–1887) |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:George Tutill/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Unexpectedlydian (talk · contribs) 18:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 16:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
This is a neat little article about a topic and person which I know nothing about! I'm looking forward to reviewing! It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Unexpectedlydian, I love your name btw!
- I have begun the review. I have a concern about the reliability of one of the sources which I addressed below. I'll hold off on the prose review until this has been addressed. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:43, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Prose (Criteria 1a, 1b, 4)
editLead
editDefinitely include that he was English/British. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Early life
editFounding and overview of business
editInternational business
editBanner manufacturing process
editStyle and reception
editArt
editPersonal life
editDeath and legacy
editSources
editHealth/formatting (Criterion 2a)
editNo broken URLs, I would recommend adding archive links for the two anonymous sources, as they will be really hard to find if the URLs go down. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
The "Works cited" section has a duplicate of "The art and ideology of the trade union emblem" source. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Reliability (Criterion 2b)
editMostly books from reliable publishers, with less reliable sources used to fill in only minor details. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
My only concern is the reliability of Roger Logan's "East Riding to East End" which seems to be self-published? It read like a reliable source, but I cannot find any references to the work, nor any information about Roger Logan being a subject expert. I'll hold off on the prose review until this concern is sorted out, since if it doesn't qualify as a reliable source that will significantly reshape the article. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Spot check (Criteria 2b, 2c, 2d)
editCopyvio (Criterion 2d)
editEarwig finds no too close paraphrasing or violations. Will check further on the spot check. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Scope (Criteria 3a, 3b)
editStable (Criterion 5)
editMedia
editThis interesting website has an image for Tutill, do you have any idea where it's from? If we can find its original source, it would be a great image for the infobox. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Tags (Criterion 6a)
editCaptions (Criterion 6b)
editTwo examples of banners manufactured by Tutill for the Court Pride of Onehunga, Ancient Order of Foresters.
- It's a bit unclear that the Court Pride of Onehunga is part of the Ancient order of Foresters, rather than them being two separate entities. Perhaps something like "Court Pride of Onehunga, a group within the Ancient Order of Foresters" would be better. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Nitpick: the grammatical subject of the sentence is "Two examples of banners", bit it is clearly meant to be the two banners themselves. Removing "examples of" fixes this ambiguity. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Link "biblical story of Zacchaeus" It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)